Re: [patch] x86, pat: freeing invalid memtype messages

From: Xiaotian Feng
Date: Fri Jun 18 2010 - 02:48:22 EST


On 06/18/2010 12:17 AM, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 03:45:59PM +0200, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Commit 20413f27163 "x86, pat: Fix memory leak in free_memtype" added an
error message in free_memtype() if rbt_memtype_erase() returns NULL.
The problem is that if CONFIG_X86_PAT is enabled, we use a different
implimentation of rbt_memtype_erase() that always returns NULL.

I've modified rbt_memtype_erase() to return an ERR_PTR() on errors and
made free_memtype() check for that instead.

Addresses: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16205

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter<error27@xxxxxxxxx>

This patch is probably ok, but it does not address my bug.
I have CONFIG_X86_PAT=y, so rbt_memtype_erase does not always return NULL.

Could you please try boot with kernel parameter "debugpat", and
show me the output of reserve_memtype/free_memtype ?


diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
index acc15b2..81b7735 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
@@ -359,10 +359,10 @@ int free_memtype(u64 start, u64 end)
entry = rbt_memtype_erase(start, end);
spin_unlock(&memtype_lock);

- if (!entry) {
+ if (IS_ERR(entry)) {
printk(KERN_INFO "%s:%d freeing invalid memtype %Lx-%Lx\n",
current->comm, current->pid, start, end);
- return -EINVAL;
+ return PTR_ERR(entry);
}

kfree(entry);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c
index f537087..90e5cbe 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c
@@ -236,8 +236,10 @@ struct memtype *rbt_memtype_erase(u64 start, u64 end)
struct memtype *data;

data = memtype_rb_exact_match(&memtype_rbroot, start, end);
- if (!data)
+ if (!data) {
+ data = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
goto out;
+ }

rb_erase(&data->rb,&memtype_rbroot);
out:




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/