Re: Overview of concurrency managed workqueue

[Tejun Heo]

On 06/16/2010 10:40 PM, Daniel Walker wrote:
>> Because the discussion isn't leading anywhere and I've already thrown
>> almost everything I can think of, so if I haven't convinced you yet
>> there's very low probability that I'll be able to do with further
>> discussion.  So, I duly collected your Nacked-by: on the reason that
>> cmwq doesn't allow setting priorities from userland.
> 
> Ok, and please don't try to summarize why there is a NAK'ed-by, if
> people want to know they can contact me directly or read this thread.

No, Daniel.  You don't get to tell me what I write or not.  If you
don't agree with the summary, feel free to offer a better one and I
would consider to update mine.  I'll provide my summary, arguments and
the link to this discussion when I send a pull request and you'll be
cc'd.  You're free to present your arguments there again if you feel
necessary.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/