Re: Overview of concurrency managed workqueue

[Daniel Walker]

On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 22:24 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 06/16/2010 10:19 PM, Daniel Walker wrote:
> >> I don't have any problem with that.  I would be almost happy to get
> >> your NACK.
> > 
> > Oh yeah? why is that?
> 
> Because the discussion isn't leading anywhere and I've already thrown
> almost everything I can think of, so if I haven't convinced you yet
> there's very low probability that I'll be able to do with further
> discussion.  So, I duly collected your Nacked-by: on the reason that
> cmwq doesn't allow setting priorities from userland.
> 
> Thanks and have a good night.

Ok, and please don't try to summarize why there is a NAK'ed-by, if
people want to know they can contact me directly or read this thread.

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/