Re: [PATCH] regulator/lp3971: Storage class should be before constqualifier

From: Mark Brown
Date: Wed Dec 23 2009 - 09:03:19 EST


On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:13:17PM +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
>
> The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning
> of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent
> feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/