Re: [PATCH] Fix tracing infrastructure to support multipleincludes when defining CREATE_TRACE_POINTS

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 07:02 -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 01:03:59PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 11:04 -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > +#if !defined(_TRACE_NAPI_H_) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
> > >  #define _TRACE_NAPI_H_
> > >  
> > 
> > Ug, I'm still getting panics because of this. I found out that it's
> > because napi->dev can be NULL.
> > 
> > Here's what I did to solve it:
> Gahhh, you're right, We had to do the same thing in net-next's commit
> f2798eb4e01b095f273f4bf40f511c9d69c0e1da.  If you queue to the backlog, the
> backlog napi instance has no net device and so its null.  This is exactly the
> right fix.

OK, I'll update the patch and apply it.

But this doesn't need to go into 33 correct. We can let it brew for 34?

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/