Re: [GIT PULL] x86: unify sys_iopl

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Fri Sep 25 2009 - 19:22:19 EST


On 09/25/09 15:56, Brian Gerst wrote:
> The correct fix is to move set_iopl_mask into do_iopl. sys_iopl
> should only be a wrapper around do_iopl to manage the different
> calling convention used by 32-bit and 64-bit.
>

The patch eliminates that distinction, so I guess do_iopl should really
be folded into sys_iopl (though the compiler effectively does that
anyway by inlining it).

J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/