Re: [tip:timers/core] timekeeping: Increase granularity ofread_persistent_clock()

[Ingo Molnar]

* Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:33:46 +0200
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > * Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > > FYI, -tip arch-testing found that this commit broke the PowerPC 
> > > > build:
> > > > 
> > > > /home/mingo/tip/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c: In function 'read_persistent_clock':
> > > > /home/mingo/tip/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c:788: error: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
> > > > /home/mingo/tip/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c:791: error: 'return' with a value, in function returning void
> > > > make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/time.o] Error 1
> > > > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > > > make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel] Error 2
> > > 
> > > I overlooked a case in the powerpc version of read_persistent_lock.
> > > New patch:
> > 
> > the patches are already committed and this patch doesnt apply - mind 
> > sending a delta fix against tip:master:
> > 
> >  http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
> 
> Here we go:

applied, thanks! (i fixed the small detail checkpatch complained 
about)

Note, i've appended it to the timer tree for now - but for the 
lockdep bug we'll need another fix, and these two bugs will probably 
trigger a rebase. I'll leave it up to Thomas whether he wants to 
rebase the end result, once things have settled down.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/