[PATCH v2] task_struct: stack_canary is not needed without CC_STACKPROTECTOR

From: Hiroshi Shimamoto
Date: Tue Aug 18 2009 - 04:02:38 EST


Andi Kleen wrote:
> Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The field stack_canary is only used with CC_STACKPROTECTOR.
>> This patch reduces task_struct size without CC_STACKPROTECTOR.
>
> Adding a ifdef in the middle of a widely used structure is nasty. It
> means that if someone changes the option then the newly loaded modules
> don't work anymore (yes that's not officially supported, but works
> most of the time and is often convenient in practice)
>
> So when you add a ifdef please move the field to the end at least.

Thanks for the comment, that's reasonable.
Here's the update.

====
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The field stack_canary is only used with CC_STACKPROTECTOR.
This patch reduces task_struct size without CC_STACKPROTECTOR.

Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 7 ++++---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index af1e328..9a1d68d 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1247,9 +1247,6 @@ struct task_struct {
pid_t pid;
pid_t tgid;

- /* Canary value for the -fstack-protector gcc feature */
- unsigned long stack_canary;
-
/*
* pointers to (original) parent process, youngest child, younger sibling,
* older sibling, respectively. (p->father can be replaced with
@@ -1494,6 +1491,10 @@ struct task_struct {
/* bitmask of trace recursion */
unsigned long trace_recursion;
#endif /* CONFIG_TRACING */
+#ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
+ /* Canary value for the -fstack-protector gcc feature */
+ unsigned long stack_canary;
+#endif
};

/* Future-safe accessor for struct task_struct's cpus_allowed. */
--
1.6.3.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/