Re: [RFC][patch 00/12] clocksource / timekeeping rework V2

[Martin Schwidefsky]

On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:17:16 -0600
dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 19:09 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:02:21 -0600
> > dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 18:50 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > > 
> > > > void clocksource_change_rating(struct clocksource *cs, int rating)
> > > 
> > > > the two functions do different things. What exactly is the idea you've
> > > > got in mind?
> > > 
> > > It's only the case when the rating goes to zero .. That makes the
> > > clocksource unusable, which is very much like unregistering it..
> > 
> > True, the clocksource code won't pick the clock any more as long as
> > there is an alternative clock available. It still shows up in the list
> > of clocks though and you can do an override with it. 
> 
> I'm not sure allowing that type of override a good idea tho .. I don't
> think it's considered a usable clock when the rating goes to zero.

Override as the root user -> your foot, no? The whole override stuff is
there for the case that the clocksource selection picked a broken clock
and you want to force the system into a semi-working state. Ideally the
whole override would go away, but that is probably wishful thinking..

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/