Re: [PATCH] x86: Reduce the default HZ value

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 19:13 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 19:09 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 10:13 -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > I think we need to reduce the general tick frequency to be as low as
> > > possible. With high resolution timers the tick frequency is just the
> > > frequency with which the timer interrupt disturbs a running application.
> > > 
> > > Are there any benefits remaining from frequent timer interrupts? I would
> > > think that 60 HZ would be sufficient.
> > > 
> > > It would be good if the kernel would be truly tickless. Scheduler events
> > > would be driven by the scheduling intervals and not the invokations of the
> > > scheduler softirq.
> > 
> > The only thing that's driven by the softirq is load-balancing, there's
> > way more to the scheduler-tick than kicking that thing awake every so
> > often.
> > 
> > The problem is that running the scheduler of off hrtimers is too
> > expensive. We have the code, we tried it, people complained.
> 
> Therefore, decreasing the HZ value to say 50, we'd get a minimum
> involuntary preemption granularity of 20ms, something on the high end of
> barely usable.

Another user is RCU, the grace period is tick driven, growing these
ticks by a factor 50 or so might require some tinkering with forced
grace periods when we notice our batch queues getting too long.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/