Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] memcg softlimit (Another one) v4

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:16:47 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2009-03-12 09:52:47]:
> I've tested so far by
> 
> Creating two cgroups and then 
> 
> a. Assigning limits of 1G and 2G and run memory allocation and touch
> test
softlimit ?

> b. Same as (a) with 1G and 1G
> c. Same as (a) with 0 and 1G
> d. Same as (a) with 0 and 0
> 
> More comments in induvidual patches.
> 
Then,
  1. what's the number of active threads ?
  2. what's the number of cpus ?
  3. what's the numa configuration, if numa ?
  4. what's the zone configuration ?
  5. what's arch ?
  6. what's amount of total memory ?
  7. Do you find difference in behavior with and without softlimit ?
  8. Do you tested *this* version ?

Thanks,
-Kame


> -- 
> 	Balbir
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/