Re: [RFC PATCH] cpuacct: per-cgroup utime/stime statistics - v1

[Balbir Singh]

* Bharata B Rao <bharata@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2009-03-12 09:59:51]:

> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:04:34PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2009-03-11 09:38:12]:
> > 
> > > BTW, I'm not sure but don't we need special handling if
> > > CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=y ?
> > 
> > Good point. Bharata, with CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING, utime and stime
> > is accounted for within the architecture.
> 
> True, but as I replied to Kamezawa in the other thread, these
> architectures are still dependent on generic implementations of
> account_{system,user}_time() which feed to per-process and system-wide
> accounting. And this is where we have hooks for per-cgroup accounting.

Fair enough...

> So I don't see why we need to handle these archs specially. Do I miss
> something ?

May be we should cc the patch to linux-arch as well to make sure
we handled all architectures correctly.

-- 
	Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/