Re: [PATCH] cls_cgroup: remove unneeded cgroup_lock

[Paul Menage]

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We can remove this lock here, since we are in cgroup write handler
> and thus the cgrp is guaranteed to be valid, and no lock is needed
> when writing a u32 variable.

There's no guarantee that the group isn't dead, so we could be writing
into a value that's never going to be used again, but I guess that's
not really a big deal.

Acked-by: Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx>

>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/sched/cls_cgroup.c |    6 ------
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_cgroup.c b/net/sched/cls_cgroup.c
> index 91a3db4..1ab4542 100644
> --- a/net/sched/cls_cgroup.c
> +++ b/net/sched/cls_cgroup.c
> @@ -62,13 +62,7 @@ static u64 read_classid(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft)
>
>  static int write_classid(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft, u64 value)
>  {
> -       if (!cgroup_lock_live_group(cgrp))
> -               return -ENODEV;
> -
>        cgrp_cls_state(cgrp)->classid = (u32) value;
> -
> -       cgroup_unlock();
> -
>        return 0;
>  }
>
> --
> 1.5.4.rc3
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/