Re: [patch] SLQB slab allocator

[Nick Piggin]

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 09:59:30AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> One thing you might consider is that
> Q is visually close enough to O to be
> misread.
> 
> Perhaps a different letter would be good.

That's a fair point. Hugh dislikes it too, I see ;) What to do... I
had been toying with the idea that if slqb (or slub) becomes "the"
allocator, then we could rename it all back to slAb after replacing
the existing slab?

Or I could make it a 128 bit allocator and call it SLZB, which would
definitely make it "the final" allocator ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/