Re: [patch] SLQB slab allocator

[Nick Piggin]

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 06:40:10PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 03:59:18PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > 
> > > Mind if i nitpick a bit about minor style issues? Since this is going to 
> > > be the next Linux SLAB allocator we might as well do it perfectly :-)
> > 
> > Well here is an incremental patch which should get most of the issues 
> > you pointed out, most of the sane ones that checkpatch pointed out, and 
> > a few of my own ;)
> 
> here's an incremental one ontop of your incremental patch, enhancing some 
> more issues. I now find the code very readable! :-)

Thanks! I'll go through it and apply it. I'll raise any issues if I
am particularly against them ;)

> ( in case you are wondering about the placement of bit_spinlock.h - that 
>   file needs fixing, just move it to the top of the file and see the build 
>   break. But that's a separate patch.)

Ah, SLQB doesn't use bit spinlocks anyway, so I'll just get rid of that.
I'll see if there are any other obviously unneeded headers too.

Thanks,
Nick

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/