Re: [patch 27/85] [PATCH 07/44] [CVE-2009-0029] System call wrapper infrastructure

[Christian Borntraeger]

Am Donnerstag 15 Januar 2009 schrieb Jiri Slaby:
> On 01/15/2009 10:59 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SYSCALL_WRAPPERS
> > +
> > +#define SYSCALL_DEFINE(name) static inline long SYSC_##name
> > +#define SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, name, ...)                                        
\
> > +     asmlinkage long sys_##name(__SC_DECL##x(__VA_ARGS__));          \
> > +     static inline long SYSC_##name(__SC_DECL##x(__VA_ARGS__));      \
> 
> Hmm, we don't support at least gcc 3.4.6 anymore :/. It seems to be the same 
as in:

I see two possible quick fixes:
-funit-at-a-time will allow these inline constructs (tested with 3.4.6 on i386 
with enabled syscall wrappers. x86_64 already sets this flag)

- dont use attribute __always_inline__ for these inlines but the standard 
inline. The question is, how to convince cpp to not replace inline with 
always_inline
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/