Re: [stable] [patch 27/85] [PATCH 07/44] [CVE-2009-0029] System callwrapper infrastructure

[Jiri Slaby]

On 01/16/2009 09:37 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 03:42:37PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:46:41PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>> On 01/15/2009 10:59 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SYSCALL_WRAPPERS
>>>> +
>>>> +#define SYSCALL_DEFINE(name) static inline long SYSC_##name
>>>> +#define SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, name, ...)                                        \
>>>> +     asmlinkage long sys_##name(__SC_DECL##x(__VA_ARGS__));          \
>>>> +     static inline long SYSC_##name(__SC_DECL##x(__VA_ARGS__));      \
>>> Hmm, we don't support at least gcc 3.4.6 anymore :/. It seems to be the same as in:
>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/6/385
>>>
>>> It doesn't like inline prototypes.
> 
> Compiles fine for me on s390 with gcc 3.4.6 on git head.
> Could you send the .config please?

Hi,

it's not matter of .config. It's matter of compiler. I can't reproduce it on my
own, I just know, that Dave had problems with inline prototypes and using of the
function they declare before the body itself was available with some gcc 3.4.6.

Dave, don't you remember where did you get the compiler from and what was the
platform?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/