Re: [PATCH v10 Golden] Unified trace buffer

From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Mon Sep 29 2008 - 23:46:20 EST


* Steven Rostedt (rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks! I must have been lucky some how not to trigger this :-/
> > >
> >
> > My guess is that you never free your buffers in your test cases. I don't
> > know if it was expected; probably not if your code is built into the
> > kernel.
>
> Actually my resize does free the buffers and I did test this. I probably
> never ran the trace when testing the freeing which means those pointers
> could have luckily not have been changed.
>
> -- Steve
>

I also got some corruption of the offset field in the struct page I use.
I think it might be related to the fact that I don't set the PG_private
bit (slob does set it when the page is in its free pages list). However,
given I'd like to pass the buffer pages to disk I/O and for network
socket and still keep the ability to re-use it when the I/O has been
performed, I wonder where I should put my

struct list_head list; /* linked list of buf pages */
size_t offset; /* page offset in the buffer */

fields ? Any ideas ?

They are currently in :

struct buf_page {
union {
struct {
unsigned long flags; /* mandatory */
atomic_t _count; /* mandatory */
union { /* mandatory */
atomic_t _mapcount;
struct {
u16 inuse;
u16 objects;
};
};
struct list_head list; /* linked list of buf pages */
size_t offset; /* page offset in the buffer */
};
struct page page;
};
};

Mathieu

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/