Re: [PATCH 2/2] rcu: fix sparse shadowed variable warning

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Tue Aug 26 2008 - 16:43:59 EST


On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 01:00:44PM -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> kernel/rcuclassic.c:564:18: warning: symbol 'flags' shadows an earlier one
> kernel/rcuclassic.c:527:16: originally declared here

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> It would be safe in this case to just remove the second declaration of flags
> and reuse it as it is outside the local_irq_save/restore pair. I did it this
> way in case there are future changes that might mix up the use of flags.
>
> Feel free to just remove the second flags declaration if you'd rather do it
> that way.
>
> kernel/rcuclassic.c | 6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcuclassic.c b/kernel/rcuclassic.c
> index 743cf05..ed15128 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcuclassic.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcuclassic.c
> @@ -561,15 +561,15 @@ static void __rcu_process_callbacks(struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp,
> local_irq_restore(flags);
>
> if (rcu_batch_after(rdp->batch, rcp->pending)) {
> - unsigned long flags;
> + unsigned long flags2;
>
> /* and start it/schedule start if it's a new batch */
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&rcp->lock, flags);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&rcp->lock, flags2);
> if (rcu_batch_after(rdp->batch, rcp->pending)) {
> rcp->pending = rdp->batch;
> rcu_start_batch(rcp);
> }
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rcp->lock, flags);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rcp->lock, flags2);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 1.6.0.340.g84854
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/