Re: Kernel oops with 2.6.26, padlock and ipsec: probably problem with fpu state changes

[Herbert Xu]

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 05:48:44PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> >Sorry, the kernel TS state is what I meant.  I'm definitely not
> >advocating the saving of the kernel FPU state.  This is only for
> >things like the VIA (which also exists for other processors, see
> >the xor SSE stuff in include/asm-x86).
> 
> No, there you are actually using the FPU state (which includes the SSE 
> state.)

Right, well at least VIA could still use this and it wouldn't
hurt others that much.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/