Re: [PATCH 1/2] add phys_addr_t for holding physical addresses

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Are we sure resource_size_t is -never- used to represent memory ? I
> though it was on some platforms....

On x86 it's optionally used to put memory in the resource tree, but if 
the memory is larger than can be held in resource_size_t it simply skips 
it.  Don't know about elsewhere.

   J

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/