Re: Regression in 2.6.27-rc1 for set_cpus_allowed_ptr

[Max Krasnyansky]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Max Krasnyansky <maxk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>> And I was hoping to do -rc3 today. Can I please have pull-requests for the 
>>> appropriate urgent scheduler/x86 fixes? Or should I just take these as 
>>> patches?
>> It'd be nice if -rc3 included my cpuset patch so that we could put circular
>> locking issues in the cpu hotplug path to the rest.
>> Ingo, I'm talking about this:
>> 	[PATCH] cpuset: Rework sched domains and CPU hotplug handling (take 4)
> 
> the latest (-v4) version of the patch was submitted just half an hour 
> ago and it's rather large/complex, with a few unrelated changes 
> (whitespace, etc.) mixed in as well. I'd like to wait for Paul's final 
> ack for -v4 (he has already agreed with the approach in general), and 
> wanted to have it tested myself as well, at least minimally.

Fair enough.

btw Whitespace and other cosmetic changes were requested by reviewers.

Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/