Re: [PATCH 0/7] mmc: at91_mci: rework to allow better transfer

[Pierre Ossman]

On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:54:41 +0200
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> Russell King highlights that patch #4 is not well inserted in the series 
> : it have to be after #5 (after correcting bytes_xfered update).
> 
> If you want I can reorder them... or you manage to do it.
> 
> I will take into account Marc's comment and new Ville patch series in 
> another round ;-)

Will you redo this series, or are you planning further patches? (i.e.
should I merge this set or wait for an update?)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature