Re: [patch 2/2] cifs - cifs_find_tcp_session cleanup

From: Cyrill Gorcunov
Date: Wed May 07 2008 - 00:17:49 EST


On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 2:07 AM, Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This looks like it would fail in the ipv6 case - because
> target_ip_addr (the ipv4 address) would be null and it would exit
> before checking.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This patch is to remove too indented code in cifs_find_tcp_session.
> > Also memcmp was used wrongly - we would have found the session
> > which IP6 addresses didn't match.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.git/fs/cifs/connect.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.git.orig/fs/cifs/connect.c 2008-05-01 19:02:51.000000000 +0400
> > +++ linux-2.6.git/fs/cifs/connect.c 2008-05-01 19:36:54.000000000 +0400
> > @@ -1318,42 +1318,44 @@ cifs_parse_mount_options(char *options,
> >
> > static struct cifsSesInfo *
> > cifs_find_tcp_session(struct in_addr *target_ip_addr,
> > - struct in6_addr *target_ip6_addr,
> > - char *userName, struct TCP_Server_Info **psrvTcp)
> > + struct in6_addr *target_ip6_addr,
> > + char *userName, struct TCP_Server_Info **psrvTcp)
> > {
> > struct list_head *tmp;
> > struct cifsSesInfo *ses;
> > +
> > *psrvTcp = NULL;
> > - read_lock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
> >
> > + if (!target_ip_addr)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + read_lock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
> > list_for_each(tmp, &GlobalSMBSessionList) {
> > ses = list_entry(tmp, struct cifsSesInfo, cifsSessionList);
> > - if (ses->server) {
> > - if ((target_ip_addr &&
> > - (ses->server->addr.sockAddr.sin_addr.s_addr
> > - == target_ip_addr->s_addr)) || (target_ip6_addr
> > - && memcmp(&ses->server->addr.sockAddr6.sin6_addr,
> > - target_ip6_addr, sizeof(*target_ip6_addr)))) {
> > - /* BB lock server and tcp session and increment
> > - use count here?? */
> > -
> > - /* found a match on the TCP session */
> > - *psrvTcp = ses->server;
> > -
> > - /* BB check if reconnection needed */
> > - if (strncmp
> > - (ses->userName, userName,
> > - MAX_USERNAME_SIZE) == 0){
> > - read_unlock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
> > - /* Found exact match on both TCP and
> > - SMB sessions */
> > - return ses;
> > - }
> > - }
> > - }
> > - /* else tcp and smb sessions need reconnection */
> > + if (!ses->server)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (ses->server->addr.sockAddr.sin_addr.s_addr != target_ip_addr->s_addr ||
> > + memcmp(&ses->server->addr.sockAddr6.sin6_addr,
> > + target_ip6_addr, sizeof(*target_ip6_addr)))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + /* BB lock server and tcp session and increment
> > + use count here?? */
> > +
> > + /* found a match on the TCP session */
> > + *psrvTcp = ses->server;
> > +
> > + /* BB check if reconnection needed */
> > + if (strncmp(ses->userName, userName, MAX_USERNAME_SIZE))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + /* Found exact match on both TCP and SMB sessions */
> > + read_unlock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
> > + return ses;
> > }
> > read_unlock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
> > +
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> >
> > --
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>

Ah, indeed! Thanks, Steve, I'm really sorry for this.
Will remake it.

Andrew, could you drop it from -mm please?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/