Re: [patch 2/2] cifs - cifs_find_tcp_session cleanup

From: Steve French
Date: Tue May 06 2008 - 18:07:57 EST


This looks like it would fail in the ipv6 case - because
target_ip_addr (the ipv4 address) would be null and it would exit
before checking.



On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch is to remove too indented code in cifs_find_tcp_session.
> Also memcmp was used wrongly - we would have found the session
> which IP6 addresses didn't match.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Index: linux-2.6.git/fs/cifs/connect.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.git.orig/fs/cifs/connect.c 2008-05-01 19:02:51.000000000 +0400
> +++ linux-2.6.git/fs/cifs/connect.c 2008-05-01 19:36:54.000000000 +0400
> @@ -1318,42 +1318,44 @@ cifs_parse_mount_options(char *options,
>
> static struct cifsSesInfo *
> cifs_find_tcp_session(struct in_addr *target_ip_addr,
> - struct in6_addr *target_ip6_addr,
> - char *userName, struct TCP_Server_Info **psrvTcp)
> + struct in6_addr *target_ip6_addr,
> + char *userName, struct TCP_Server_Info **psrvTcp)
> {
> struct list_head *tmp;
> struct cifsSesInfo *ses;
> +
> *psrvTcp = NULL;
> - read_lock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
>
> + if (!target_ip_addr)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + read_lock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
> list_for_each(tmp, &GlobalSMBSessionList) {
> ses = list_entry(tmp, struct cifsSesInfo, cifsSessionList);
> - if (ses->server) {
> - if ((target_ip_addr &&
> - (ses->server->addr.sockAddr.sin_addr.s_addr
> - == target_ip_addr->s_addr)) || (target_ip6_addr
> - && memcmp(&ses->server->addr.sockAddr6.sin6_addr,
> - target_ip6_addr, sizeof(*target_ip6_addr)))) {
> - /* BB lock server and tcp session and increment
> - use count here?? */
> -
> - /* found a match on the TCP session */
> - *psrvTcp = ses->server;
> -
> - /* BB check if reconnection needed */
> - if (strncmp
> - (ses->userName, userName,
> - MAX_USERNAME_SIZE) == 0){
> - read_unlock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
> - /* Found exact match on both TCP and
> - SMB sessions */
> - return ses;
> - }
> - }
> - }
> - /* else tcp and smb sessions need reconnection */
> + if (!ses->server)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (ses->server->addr.sockAddr.sin_addr.s_addr != target_ip_addr->s_addr ||
> + memcmp(&ses->server->addr.sockAddr6.sin6_addr,
> + target_ip6_addr, sizeof(*target_ip6_addr)))
> + continue;
> +
> + /* BB lock server and tcp session and increment
> + use count here?? */
> +
> + /* found a match on the TCP session */
> + *psrvTcp = ses->server;
> +
> + /* BB check if reconnection needed */
> + if (strncmp(ses->userName, userName, MAX_USERNAME_SIZE))
> + continue;
> +
> + /* Found exact match on both TCP and SMB sessions */
> + read_unlock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
> + return ses;
> }
> read_unlock(&GlobalSMBSeslock);
> +
> return NULL;
> }
>
>
> --
>



--
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/