Re: [PATCH] x86_64: update e820 instead of updating end_pfn

[Andi Kleen]

On Sunday 20 January 2008 10:20:27 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > [PATCH] x86_64: update e820 instead of updating end_pfn
> >
> > when mtrr is not covering all e820 table, need to trim the ram, need
> > to update e820
>
> ok, i like this approach even more - applied. Would you like to have a
> shot at adding mtrr_trim_uncached_memory() to 32-bit too? It is affected
> by the same problem (if not more).

What about the AMD fix I posted? You ignored that one for now but it is far 
more critical because it makes these patches break any modern AMD machine
with >3GB.

-Andi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/