Re: [PATCH] x86_64: update e820 instead of updating end_pfn

[Ingo Molnar]

* Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> [PATCH] x86_64: update e820 instead of updating end_pfn
> 
> when mtrr is not covering all e820 table, need to trim the ram, need 
> to update e820

ok, i like this approach even more - applied. Would you like to have a 
shot at adding mtrr_trim_uncached_memory() to 32-bit too? It is affected 
by the same problem (if not more).

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/