Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2

[Ingo Molnar]

* William Lee Irwin III <wli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 04:46:57PM +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
>
> > Have you considered using rq->raw_weighted_load instead of 
> > rq->nr_running in calculating fair_clock?  This would take the nice 
> > value (or RT priority) of the other tasks into account when 
> > determining what's fair.
> 
> I suspect you mean 
> (curr->load_weight*delta_exec)/rq->raw_weighted_load in update_curr().

good idea, i'll try that.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/