Re: [patch] CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler), v2

[William Lee Irwin III]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> this is the second release of the CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler) 
>> patchset, against v2.6.21-rc7:
>>    http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/sched-cfs-v2.patch
>> i'd like to thank everyone for the tremendous amount of feedback and 
>> testing the v1 patch got - i could hardly keep up with just reading the 
>> mails! Some of the stuff people addressed i couldnt implement yet, i 
>> mostly concentrated on bugs, regressions and debuggability.

On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 04:46:57PM +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
> Have you considered using rq->raw_weighted_load instead of 
> rq->nr_running in calculating fair_clock?  This would take the nice 
> value (or RT priority) of the other tasks into account when determining 
> what's fair.

I suspect you mean (curr->load_weight*delta_exec)/rq->raw_weighted_load
in update_curr().


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/