Re: [PATCH] Bugfix for VMI paravirt ops

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Thu Apr 05 2007 - 21:37:44 EST


Zachary Amsden wrote:
> Do you mean kmap_atomic_pfn?

Yes.

> kunmap_atomic can stay lazy (at least for VMI), actually, but it
> doesn't help since it happens outside the spin lock.

May as well be consistent. Or do you mean you can't flush outside the
spinlock, even if there's nothing pending?

J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/