Re: Coding style RFC: convert "for (i=0;i<ARRAY_SIZE(array);i++)"to "array_for_each(index, array)"

[Nick Piggin]

Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 15:19 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> > > > #define array_for_each(element, array) \
> > > > 	for (int __idx = 0; __idx < ARRAY_SIZE((array)); \
> > > > 		__idx++, (element) = &(array[__idx]))
> >
> > If you really wanted to introduce your loop, then please call it
> > array_for_each_idx, or something to distinguish it.
>
>
> perhaps:
>
> #define array_for_each(element, array) \
> 	for ((element) = (array); \
> 	     (element) < ((array) + ARRAY_SIZE((array))); \
> 	     (element)++)

If you're going for consistency, then shouldn't this be
array_for_each_entry()?

> #define array_for_each_index(index, array) \
> 	for ((index) = 0; (index) < ARRAY_SIZE((array)); (index)++)

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/