Re: + ocfs2-relative-atime-support-tweaks.patch added to -mm tree

[Andrew Morton]

On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:28:09 -0800
Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >  	if (vfsmnt->mnt_flags & MNT_RELATIME) {
> > -		if ((timespec_compare(&inode->i_atime, &inode->i_mtime) < 0) ||
> > -		    (timespec_compare(&inode->i_atime, &inode->i_ctime) < 0))
> > +		if ((timespec_compare(&inode->i_atime, &inode->i_mtime) <= 0) ||
> > +		    (timespec_compare(&inode->i_atime, &inode->i_ctime) <= 0))
> >  			return 1;
> Hmm, should we fix up touch_atime() to use "<=" as well? Maybe I didn't read
> it correctly...

The logic I have there is the same (I hope)...

+			if (timespec_compare(&inode->i_mtime,
+						&inode->i_atime) < 0 &&
+			    timespec_compare(&inode->i_ctime,
+						&inode->i_atime) < 0)
+				return;

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/