RE: bogofilter ate 3/5

[Stuart MacDonald]

From: Chase Venters [mailto:chase.venters@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> What are you implying - that SpamCop doesn't make decisions 
> about who to 
> block and who to not block for third parties? Their weasel wording 

It's not an implication, it's a fact.

> I will strongly criticize any service that purports to label 
> senders of 
> automatic responses as senders of unsolicited mail. The 

What would you call it then when I receive a bounce/etc that is in
reponse to a message someone else sent? I certainly never solicited
that.

Perhaps you could send me your snail mail address; I'll solicit some
junk mail but put your address down. But don't call it junk mail when
you receive it, because it was solicited!

> And on the specific issue of autoresponders, I think a reasonable 
> compromise is to support DomainKeys. That way if a sender is 
> irritated 
> that they are receiving automatic responses from messages they didn't 
> send, they can personally take action to invalidate the forgery.

IMO one should never have to receive "automatic responses from
messages they didn't send".

> But mark my words: Asking hosts to stop sending bounce messages or 
> automatic responses is insane and contrary to over a decade 
> of established 
> postmaster precedent.

Things change.

..Stu

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/