Re: RFC - how to balance Dirty+Writeback in the face of slow writeback.

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Aug 18 2006 - 03:09:29 EST


On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:03:15 +0200
Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 17 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > It seems that the many-writers-to-different-disks workloads don't happen
> > very often. We know this because
> >
> > a) The 2.4 performance is utterly awful, and I never saw anybody
> > complain and
>
> Talk to some of the people that used DVD-RAM devices (or other
> excruciatingly slow writers) on their system, and they would disagree
> violently :-)

umm, OK, I guess that has the same cause: buffer_heads from different
devices all on the same single queue. In this case the problem is that one
device is slow. In the same-speed-devices case the problem is that all
writeback threads get stuck on the same device, allowing others to go idle.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/