On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:44, Peter Staubach wrote:
really expect RENAME to be reordered as mv is generally consideredCan you construct a testcase which exhibits this behavior?
atomic. That, and RFC 1813 mandates RENAME to be atomic. Is this a
known thing and do you guys consider this feature or a bug?
Possibly .. if someone first acks that this indeed would be
considered as bug and not as a feature :/