Re: NFSv3 client reordering RENAMEs

[Janne Karhunen]

On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:44, Peter Staubach wrote:

> >really expect RENAME to be reordered as mv is generally considered
> >atomic. That, and RFC 1813 mandates RENAME to be atomic. Is this a
> >known thing and do you guys consider this feature or a bug?
>
> Can you construct a testcase which exhibits this behavior?

Possibly .. if someone first acks that this indeed would be
considered as bug and not as a feature :/ 


-- 
// Janne
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/