Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)

From: Joerg Schilling
Date: Fri Feb 10 2006 - 06:02:35 EST


Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> Right. The question was rather like this:
> Say we have our non-stable /dev/sr0 mapping to /dev/sg0, and it has got BTL
> 1,1,0. Now, if the user starts `cdrecord -dev=1,1,0`,
> `ls -l /proc/$(pidof -s cdrecord)/fd/` should show (and in fact did when I
> used ide-scsi back then) /dev/sg0, right?
>
> If so, what's wrong with just opening /dev/sg0 directly (as per user
> request, i.e. cdrecord -dev=/dev/sg0) and sending the scsi commands down
> the fd?

As I did write _many_ times, this was done by the program "cdwrite" on Linux
in 1995 and as cdwrite did not check whether if actually got a CD writer,
cdwrite did destroy many hard disk drives just _because_ the /dev/sg*
is non-stable.

People did not believe this and did write shell scripts with e.g. /dev/sg0
inside and later suffered from the non-stable /dev/sg* <-> device relation.


Jörg

--
EMail:joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (uni)
schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/