Re: [PATCH] pepoll_wait ...

[Davide Libenzi]

On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Ulrich Drepper <drepper@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > > The attached patch implements the pepoll_wait system call, that extend
> > > the event wait mechanism with the same logic ppoll and pselect do. The
> > > definition of pepoll_wait is: [...]
> >
> > I definitely ACK this patch, it's needed for the same reasons we need
> > pselect and ppoll.
>
> It busts most architectures.
>
> fs/eventpoll.c: In function `sys_pepoll_wait':
> fs/eventpoll.c:727: error: `TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> It seems that the preferred way to fix this is to sprinkle #ifdef
> TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK all over the code.

Hey, I've written in the comments that it depends on the 
TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK bits ;) The latest one that dwmw posted used such 
feature, so I though to align epoll bits to that too.



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/