Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla

[Bill Davidsen]

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > not a post-2.6.14 regression
>
>
> Well yeah.  But that doesn't mean thse things have lower priority that
> post-2.6.14 regressions.
>
> I understand what you're doing here, but we should in general concentrate
> upon the most severe bugs rather than upon the most recent..

Hypocratic oath: "First, do no harm."

If a new kernel version can't make things *better*, at least it 
shouldn't make them *worse*. New features are good, performance 
improvements are good, breaking working systems with an update is not good.

I'm with Adrian on this, if you want people to test and report with -rc 
kernels, then there should be some urgency to addressing the reported 
problems.
--
   -bill davidsen (davidsen@xxxxxxx)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
 last possible moment - but no longer"  -me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/