Re: 2.6.15-rc6: known regressions in the kernel Bugzilla

[Adrian Bunk]

On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 06:08:27AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > not a post-2.6.14 regression
> >
> 
> Well yeah.  But that doesn't mean thse things have lower priority that
> post-2.6.14 regressions.
> 
> I understand what you're doing here, but we should in general concentrate
> upon the most severe bugs rather than upon the most recent..

Regressions are worse than other bugs since they break working setups 
after a kernel upgrade, and should therefore be fixed before 2.6.15 
gets released.

This should in no way imply that other severe bugs shouldn't be fixed.

One thing why I'm currently pointing to such regressions is that I can't 
stand people whining noone would test -rc kernels while we aren't even 
able to handle all the regressions reported by people who actually do 
test our -rc kernels.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/