Re: [PATCH 4/4] Swap migration V3: sys_migrate_pages interface

[Kamezawa Hiroyuki]

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>
>
> > > > How about this ?
> > > > +cpuset_update_task_mems_allowed(task, new);    (this isn't implemented
> > > > now
> >
> > *new* is already guaranteed to be the subset of current mem_allowed.
> > Is this violate the permission ?
>
>  
> Could the cpuset_mems_allowed(task) function update the mems_allowed if 
> needed?
It looks I was wrong :(
see Paul's e-mail. he describes the problem of my suggestion in detail.

-- Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/