Re: [PATCH 4/4] Swap migration V3: sys_migrate_pages interface

From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Fri Oct 21 2005 - 11:27:45 EST


On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:

> > > How about this ?
> > > +cpuset_update_task_mems_allowed(task, new); (this isn't implemented
> > > now
>
> *new* is already guaranteed to be the subset of current mem_allowed.
> Is this violate the permission ?

Could the cpuset_mems_allowed(task) function update the mems_allowed if
needed?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/