Re: [Ext2-devel] [RFC] Adding multiple block allocation

From: Suparna Bhattacharya
Date: Sat Apr 30 2005 - 11:57:05 EST


On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 05:44:26PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> Oops, sorry about the empty message ...
>
> > -static int ext3_writepages_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
> > - struct buffer_head *bh, int create)
> > +static int ext3_writepages_get_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock,
> > + unsigned long max_blocks, struct buffer_head *bh, int create)
> > {
> > - return ext3_direct_io_get_blocks(inode, iblock, 1, bh, create);
> > + return ext3_direct_io_get_blocks(inode, iblock, max_blocks, bh, create);
> > }
> >
>
> I have a question here, ext3_direct_io_get_blocks use DIO_CREDITS
> (EXT3_RESERVE_TRANS_BLOCKS + 32 = ) to reserve the space for
> journalling, but it seems based on assumption of one data block update
> once a time. Is it sufficent to re-use that routine for multiple block
> allocation here? Don't we need something like
> ext3_writepage_trans_blocks() here?

Quite likely - with your patch, as get_blocks actually allocates
multiple blocks at a time, the min credits estimate would
change for ext3_direct_io_get_blocks/ext3_writepages_get_blocks.

Regards
Suparna

>
> Thanks,
> Mingming
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
> Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
> opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
> win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
> _______________________________________________
> Ext2-devel mailing list
> Ext2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ext2-devel

--
Suparna Bhattacharya (suparna@xxxxxxxxxx)
Linux Technology Center
IBM Software Lab, India

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/