Re: [PATCH] fs/fcntl.c : don't test unsigned value for less than zero

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 09:21:50AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 02:31:00AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 03:07:42AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > 'arg' is unsigned so it can never be less than zero, so testing for that 
> > > is pointless and also generates a warning when building with gcc -W. This 
> > > patch eliminates the pointless check.
> > 
> > Didn't Linus already reject this one 6 months ago?
> 
> I think Linux only complained if we're using some typedef that actually
> may be signed.  For fcntl that 'arg' argument is unsigned and that's hardcoded
> in the ABI.  So the check doesn't make sense at all.

No, it was exactly this patch:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0401.0/1816.html

-- 
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon 
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince 
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep 
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/