Re: [PATCH 2/2] del_timer_sync: proof of concept

[Ingo Molnar]

* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> New rules:
> 	->_base &  1	: is timer pending
> 	->_base & ~1	: timer's base

how would it look like if we had a separate timer->pending field after
all? Would it be faster/cleaner?

(we dont need to keep them small _that_ bad - if there's a good reason
we should rather add a clean new field than to encode two fields into
one field and complicate the code.)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/