RE: node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken

[YhLu]

forget about it. I found the reason:  I only put node 0 has RAM installed.

YH 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: YhLu 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 9:40 PM
> To: Andi Kleen
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken
> 
> I add some printk in k8_bus.c
> 
> node id = 0, node_to_cpumask = f
> i= 0 ldtbus = 0
> i= 1 ldtbus = 40100
> i= 2 ldtbus = 0
> node id = 1, node_to_cpumask = 0
> i= 0 ldtbus = 0
> i= 1 ldtbus = 0
> i= 2 ldtbus = 70500
> node id = 2, node_to_cpumask = 0
> i= 0 ldtbus = 0
> i= 1 ldtbus = 0
> i= 2 ldtbus = 0
> node id = 3, node_to_cpumask = 0
> i= 0 ldtbus = 0
> i= 1 ldtbus = 0
> i= 2 ldtbus = 0
> k8-bus.c: bus 5 has empty cpu mask
> k8-bus.c: bus 6 has empty cpu mask
> k8-bus.c: bus 7 has empty cpu mask
> 
> it seems node_to_cpu_mask broken.
> 
> I'm using 2.6.11-RC4.
> 
> YH
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> linux-kernel" in the body of a message to 
> majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at  
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/