Re: [PATCH] relayfs redux, part 2

[Tom Zanussi]

Karim Yaghmour writes:
 > 
 > Tom Zanussi wrote:
 > > OK, makes sense to me - I'll get rid of relay_reserve and replace it
 > > with the simple putc write and variant.
 > 
 > Please don't do that. Instead, bring back the ad-hoc mode code, that's
 > what is was for anyway.
 > 

I don't think they need to be mutually exclusive - we could keep
relay_reserve(), but the relay_write() that's currently built on top
of relay_reserve() would use the putc code instead.  It's complicating
the API a bit, but if it makes everyone happy...

Tom

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/