Re: [PATCH] relayfs redux, part 2

[Karim Yaghmour]

Tom Zanussi wrote:
> OK, makes sense to me - I'll get rid of relay_reserve and replace it
> with the simple putc write and variant.

Please don't do that. Instead, bring back the ad-hoc mode code, that's
what is was for anyway.

> You could just create and log into a separate relayfs channel, if you
> wanted to.  Not sure we need to add anything special to support that.

Postprocessing doesn't solve world famine ;) As far as LTT goes,
splitting events like this makes it impossible to read large traces.
Other clients are free to do as they wish.

Karim
-- 
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || karim@xxxxxxxxxxx || 1-866-677-4546
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/