Re: Patch 4/6 randomize the stack pointer

From: John Richard Moser
Date: Sat Jan 29 2005 - 13:11:55 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 12:49:05PM -0500, John Richard Moser wrote:
>
>>>The ideas in IBM's ProPolice changes are good and worth
>>>implementing, but the current implementation is bad.
>>>
>>
>>Lies. I've read the paper on the current implementation, it's
>>definitely good. It only operates on C/C++ code though, but that's the
>>scope of it.
>
>
> Yeah, I guess your extensive compiler internals experience and knowledge
> of gcc internals weights a lot more than the opinion of the gcc team..
>

I read "implementation" as "the way it's implemented," not as "the
quality of the code."

Did I miss the target? *Aims in the other direction then?*

>

- --
All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the
Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFB+9GthDd4aOud5P8RAm/FAJwNvbrxPP8fcJmMM//vcYL10nMXTACggi57
jOKfS4FU1sdPL7AjKRgMmBg=
=igR0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/