Re: Patch 4/6 randomize the stack pointer

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Sat Jan 29 2005 - 12:57:03 EST


On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 12:49:05PM -0500, John Richard Moser wrote:
> > The ideas in IBM's ProPolice changes are good and worth
> > implementing, but the current implementation is bad.
> >
>
> Lies. I've read the paper on the current implementation, it's
> definitely good. It only operates on C/C++ code though, but that's the
> scope of it.

Yeah, I guess your extensive compiler internals experience and knowledge
of gcc internals weights a lot more than the opinion of the gcc team..

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/